This is pretty near the top of theological absurdity:
Civil rights campaigner Jesse Jackson delivered a message of encouragement to Occupy London protesters this week...."There is something powerful about this demonstration here at St Paul's. You represent Jesus standing outside the temple," said the church minister."Jesus was an Occupier, born under a death warrant, a Jew by religion, born in poverty under Roman occupation.”..."The occupiers' cause is a just cause, a moral cause. They should not be dismissed but heard – listen to their message."Banks got bailed out, people got left out. Protesters are criminalised but not a single banker has gone to jail for their crimes, the corruption and greed which drove the global economy to the brink of collapse."
Let's compare Jesus' kingdom ethic from Matthew 5 with the methods of OWS:Matthew 5:38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘AN EYE FOR AN EYE, AND A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH.’ 39 “But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also. 40 “If anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, let him have your coat also. 41 “Whoever forces you to go one mile, go with him two. 42 “Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you.
- The redistributive justice of 'social justice' theories, for all that may be right or wrong about it, still operates on the plain of lex talionis. It assumes that the rich swindled money to get rich (not always the case in capitalism) and so we should repay them eye for an eye in the sense of redistributing money dollar for dollar--from one to another. It therefore still operates on a retributive justice: You made dollar A through exploitation therefore I will take dollar A from you. How is that not eye for eye? It is not a kingdom ethic.
- The occupiers are not teaching a radical cheek turning ethic but rather an active (even if non-violent in some cases) resistance. There is debate about how passive the 'turn the other cheek' is. It may force people to acknowledge equal dignity--and thus would have some sympathy to what occupiers claim to want. More likely, it demonstrates a servant's heart that allows oneself to be mildly injured, ridiculed but utterly humiliated and despised for the sake of others. This thought is demonstrated in the further articulation of Jesus' message.
- Jesus taught that if people were going to exploit us from our money through lawsuits we should be willing to give more. If they sue you for your shirt (to exploit you); give them your shirt and coat. If OWS thinks Wall Street exploited them--a kingdom method would teach the radical irrelevance of money for kingdom ethics by handing over more of it to the exploiter. This is not an ethic on how to make a living but how to disarm the exploiter by showing his values are in fact unvaluable when faced with the kingdom. --I hardly see OWS saying 'they've exploited us, let them have more' --just the opposite they crave the value of a worldly systems of money and essential want to redistribute it equally. A kingdom ethic actually gives it away rather than crying out for equal redistribution.
- Jesus taught us to go the extra mile for the one exploiting us. Again, this is hardly what OWS is doing. If they really wanted to have a kingdom ethic maybe they should carry an executive's brief case, drive their car covering the expense of gas, or carry a cup of coffee to them at no charge. Overturn their greed by going above and beyond in the face of it. This is the kingdom ethic.
- Give to him who asks. Instead of sacrificially giving and lending to others, OWS is more worried about people who have borrowed from others. They a group A trying to tell group B (Government) to take from Group C (Wall Street/Rich) and Give to Group D. In the kingdom ethic--if Group D has a need group A give sacrificially.